Interdependence of flows when merge in rail tunnel evacuations
Keywords:merging flows, evacuation, experimental data set, rail tunnels
AbstractThe understanding of merging flows during evacuation can have important implications for rail tunnels safety. This paper explores the interdependence of the merging of flows coming from the walkway with those exiting the train. Eight train exit configurations were tested using a mock-up of a rail car exit and a lateral walkway involving 77 participants (mean age 48; standard deviation 15; range 18-74). New measurements and data processing methods are proposed allowing statistical analysis to be performed. The results provide quantitative evidence of the preferences between flows. We found that the bias in the evacuation was slightly in favour of the walkway when train exit was at 0 m in height. Contrary to expectations a moderate dominance of walkway flow was observed at 0.8 m in height. Less variation was found for the train exit at 1.2 m in height with a clear priority of walkway flow. This happened despite deference behaviours performed by participants, i.e. people stopped to help those entering from the rail car. This novel contribution aims to provide a new method for those involved in development and validation of new and current evacuation modelling tools and those who want to improve their understanding of merging behaviour during evacuation in rail tunnels.
E. Ronchi, P. Colonna, J. Capote, D. Alvear, N. Berloco, and A. Cuesta, “The evaluation of different evacuation models for assessing road tunnel safety analysis”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 30, pp. 74-84, 2012.
J. Capote, D. Alvear, O. Abreu, and A. Cuesta, “Analysis of evacuation procedures in high speed train fires”, Fire Safety Journal, vol. 49, pp. 35-46, 2012a.
J. Capote, D. Alvear, O. Abreu, A. Cuesta and V. Alonso, “A stochastic approach for simulation human behavior during evacuation process in passenger trains”, Fire Technology, vol. 48, pp. 911-925, 2012b.
A. Cuesta, D. Alvear, O. Abreu, and D. Silió, “Real-time stochastic evacuation models for decision support in actual emergencies”, in IAFSS Fire Safety Science, New Zealand, 2014, vol. 11, pp. 1063-1076.
A. Cuesta, O. Abreu, and D. Alvear, “Future challenges in evacuation modelling”, in Evacuation Modeling Trends, Ed. Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 103-129.
W. L. Wang and T. Y. Jacqueline Lo, “A Simulation Study on Passenger Escape in Rail Tunnels”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 71, pp. 552-557, 2014.
B. V. Weyenberge and X. Deckers, “Development of a risk assessment method for fire in rail tunnels”, in the 7th International Conference Tunnel Safety and Ventilation, Graz, 2014, pp. 180-189.
K. Fridolf, D. Nilsson and H. Frantzich, “The flow rate of people during train evacuation in rail tunnels: Effects of different train exit configurations”, Safety Science, vol. 62, pp. 515-529, 2014a.
K. Fridolf, D. Nilsson and H. Frantzich, “Evacuation of a Metro Train in an Underground Rail Transportation System: Flow Rate Capacity of Train Exits, Tunnel Walking Speeds and Exit Choice”, Fire Technology, vol. 52, pp. 1481-1518, 2016.
M. Oswald, H. Kirchberger and C. Lebeda, “Evacuation of a high floor metro train in a tunnel situation: experimental findings”, in Fourth International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, PED 2008, Springer, University of Wuppertal, Germany, 2008, pp. 67–81.
A. Norén, and J. Winér, “Modelling Crowd Evacuation from Road and Train Tunnels-Data and design for faster evacuations”, Report 5127, Dept. of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University, Sweden.
M. Seike, N. Kawabata and M. Hasegawa, “Experiments of evacuation speed in smoke-filled tunnel”, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 53, pp. 61-67, 2016.
H. Frantzich and D. Nilsson, “Evacuation experiments in a smoke filled tunnel”, in Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium Human Behaviour in Fire, Belfast, United Kingdom, 2004, pp. 229– 238.
V. Lundström, J. Ahlfont and D. Nilsson, “The effect of raised walkway design on evacuation behaviour in rail tunnels”, in IAFSS Fire Safety Science, New Zealand, 2014, vol. 11, pp. 1091-1102.
E. R. Galea, D. Blackshields, K. M. Finney and D. P. Cooney, “Passenger Train Emergency Systems: Development of Prototype railEXODUS Software for U.S. Passenger Rail Car Egress”, Final Report, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration.
S. Gwynne, E. Kuligowski, J. Kratchman and J. A. Milke, “Questioning the linear relationship between doorway width and achievable flow rate”, Fire Safety Journal, vol. 44, pp. 80–87, 2009.
J. W. Tukey, Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading (Addison-Wesley), Massachusetts, 1977.
J. G. Eisenhauer, “Regression through the Origin”, Teaching Statistics, vol. 25, pp. 76 – 80, 2003.
L. Lian, X. Mai, W. Song, Y. K. K. Richard, Y. Rui and S. Jin, “Pedestrian merging behavior analysis: An experimental study”, Fire Safety Journal, vol. 91, pp. 918-925, 2017.
European Commission, “Concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to ‘safety in railway tunnels’ of the rail system of the European Union”, Official Journal of the European Union, Commission Regulation (EU), no. 1303/2014, 2014.
Fire in Tunnels, “Fire Safe Design-Rail Tunnels”, European Thematic Network Fire in Tunnels, Technical report part 2. [Online]. Available: https://www.iroads.co.il/sites/default/files/imce/fit_-_fire_in_tunnels_-_part_2.pdf
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Adriana Balboa, Daniel Alvear, Orlando Abreu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Collective Dynamics agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
This license allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Authors retain copyright of their work. They are permitted and encouraged to post items submitted to Collective Dynamics on personal or institutional websites and repositories, prior to and after publication (while providing the bibliographic details of that publication).