Pedestrian flow characteristics through bends: Effects of angle and desired speed
Keywords:pedestrian flow, pedestrian turning behaviour, fundamental diagram, crowd experiment
AbstractThis study quantitatively described how the desired speed, which may reflect the emergency level, and the angle of bend affect the pedestrian flow by comparing fundamental diagrams derived from trajectory data collected through laboratory experiments. Results showed that the slow running (≈ 2.8 m/s speed) can increase the maximum flow through a bend by around 60 % compared to normal walking (≈ 1.4 m/s speed) regardless of the turning angle. Further, it was found that the turning angle of the bend has a stronger negative impact on the moving speed of crowds under running conditions. Compared to the turning angle, congestion level seemed to have a minor impact on the average moving speed through the bends. On the other hand, for 90° and 180° bends, the variations of the speed were observed to decrease with the increase of density which indicated that although congestion level deteriorated the flow conditions at bends, it homogenized the collective moving speed of pedestrians.
C. Dias, M. Sarvi, N. Shiwakoti, O. Ejtemai and M. Burd, "Examining the Impact of Different Turning Angles on the Collective Egress of Crowds", Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167-181, 2014.
C. Dias, M. Sarvi, O. Ejtemai and M. Burd, “Elevated desired speed and change in desired direction: effects on collective pedestrian flow characteristics”, Transp Res Rec, vol. 2490, pp. 65-75, 2015.
B. Steffen and A. Seyfried, "Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter", Physica A, vol. 389, no. 9, pp. 1902-1910, 2010.
J. Fruin, Pedestrian planning and design. New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, 1971.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Jiahua Zhang, Charitha Dias, Majid Sarvi, Miho Iryo Asano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Collective Dynamics agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
This license allows:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Authors retain copyright of their work. They are permitted and encouraged to post items submitted to Collective Dynamics on personal or institutional websites and repositories, prior to and after publication (while providing the bibliographic details of that publication).